Satyen says: April 22, 2013 at 3:18 pm
See the striking difference between the prophets of Buddhism, Jainism, Christianity versus Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.
1. The prophets of other religions were either unmarried or had only one wife. On the other hand Muhammad had at least twleve wives.
2. Other prophets were married at much younger, before 25 years of age with a girl of similar age and lived as celibate (not having sex) after 30 years of age or so. Muhammad on the other hand kept on marrying until his death at age 62 with women much younger to him (he even married a grand daughter like girl aged 6 when he was 52 years of age). He didn’t practice celibacy at all (in fact he died lip locked with his youngest wife).
3. Others addressed other women as daughters/mothers depending on their ages, but Muhammad never addressed them that way as he considered them. Muslims even today don’t address other girls as daughters/sisters/mothers (there could be exceptions due to cultural reasons in Indian sub-continent).
4. The highest goal of life (In Buddhism and Jainism apart from Hinduism) is not Paradise/Heaven but freedom. In fact the desire to go to heaven/paradise was considered the impediment to achieve the highest goal. Muhammad on the other hand considered it the highest goal.
5. Others considered practicing celibacy as a virtue but Muhammad considered sensuality as a motivating factor and hence he didn’t preach celibacy at all.
6. Other prophets were peace lovers and preached forgiveness and peace and forbade wars/battles. Muhammad preached wars/battles and himself participated in them. In fact he went further and encouraged his entourage for plundering wealth and women of Non-Muslims as everthing belonged to Muslims, not to the kafirs!
7. Others considered women as respectables and didn’t allow the men to beat them. In fact respecting them was considered a virtue. Muhammad allowed them to be beated by the males.
8. Others didn’t prescribe any dress codes for the women while Muhammad prescribed.
9. Others considered women equally qualified for the final goal of life depending on their behaviour. Also they considered the women as competent as the males. Muhammad, on the other hand considered the womenfolk as having half the intellect of males and a poor candidates for the Heaven/Paradise.
10. Muhammad cried bitterly helplessly at the death of his son while others remain poised even in trying situations.
Muhammad even after marrying 12 brides and passing all nights in their company, survived with a lone daughter who died just after his death at the age of 30 or so!
Based on the above facts, the Muslims should think without any malice against non-Muslims, what was so special or sublime in Muhammad to consider Him a prophet. Make your won research without any prejudice and draw conclusion.
More information: x, x, x, x.
Return to Home, Blogs, How to Share? Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Book, Media.
It’s a reality that Indian Muslims are more humane. The reason is still they don’t follow Muhammad to that extent as the Arabian Muslims follow because the Indian Muslims still have the shades of their Hindu ancestry. In other words, they are still partially Hindus under the banner of Islam and not a Muhammad follower to the hilt. Unfortunately, slowly but steadily, they are drifting towards the Arabian culture in the name of Islam as Islam represents nothing but the Arabian culture modified by Muhammad! This development will cause the transformation of the Indian Muslims towards the Arabic Muslims. The symptoms are visible. The examples are as follows:
1. Circumcision
2. Arabic beard with no moustache
3. Arabic cap
4. Burqa/Naqab
5. Learning Arabic language
6. Arabic style dresses for males and females
7. Hardening of Quranic beliefs
Entry points of a culture are through the dress, language, food habits, belief systems etc. In this way, Muslims in India represent the slavery of Arabic culture as it has been thrust upon them, either physically or mentally. Mental slavery is recognized by the people’s pride in foreign culture and deriding their own. Indian Muslims take pride in narrating how they have become superior by following Muhammad.
The Indian Muslims have not understood this fact so far and it’s high time they understood it otherwise it may become too late once they forget their true identity i.e. Hindu ancestry. Needless to say, they will be lost to the horrendous life style of Arabs.
The Arabic culture has enveloped the Muslims of India and in a few generations, when they will have shed the remaining shades of Hindu ancestry, the Indian Muslims will become the replica of the Arabic Muslims with the same characteriscs mentioned by you.
So, come to the roots of your ancestors to have the better life style for you and your progenies.
I have utmost respect for Allah but I hold Muhammad for misguiding his followers, away from the compassionate Allah. By the way, why do we need Muhammad for praying Allah? Who introduced Muhammad between the Allah and His creation? It was Muhammad who made himself a middle man!
Think on the aforementioned points with a cool head and do for your upliftment. Choice is yours.
Allah may guide you to the true path, away from the Arabic Muhammad’s slavery!
Readers, see the following link describing what the Japanese think about Islam and how they treat the Muslims:
http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-land-without-muslims/2013/05/19/
1. The prophets of other religions were either unmarried or had only one wife. On the other hand Muhammad had at least twleve wives.
* OK SO REMAIN UNMARRIED AND SLEEP AROUND WITH WHOEVER YOU LIKE?
2. Other prophets were married at much younger, before 25 years of age with a girl of similar age and lived as celibate (not having sex) after 30 years of age or so. Muhammad on the other hand kept on marrying until his death at age 62 with women much younger to him (he even married a grand daughter like girl aged 6 when he was 52 years of age). He didn’t practice celibacy at all (in fact he died lip locked with his youngest wife).
* OK SO IF WE FOLLOW OTHER PROPHETS, EVERYONE SHOULD PRACTICE CELIBACY AND ONE DAY THERE WILL BE NO HUMANS??
3. Others addressed other women as daughters/mothers depending on their ages, but Muhammad never addressed them that way as he considered them. Muslims even today don’t address other girls as daughters/sisters/mothers (there could be exceptions due to cultural reasons in Indian sub-continent).
* COME TO AN ARAB COUNTRY WHERE ISLAM IS PROPERLY FOLLOWED, YOU WILL SEE THE DIFFERENCE. WHICH COUNTRY IN THE WORLD HAS PRIORITY FOR WOMEN? ARAB COUNTRIES HAVE PRIORITY FOR FEMALES EVERYWHERE. ISLAM CAME FROM THE ARAB COUNTIRES.
4. The highest goal of life (In Buddhism and Jainism apart from Hinduism) is not Paradise/Heaven but freedom. In fact the desire to go to heaven/paradise was considered the impediment to achieve the highest goal. Muhammad on the other hand considered it the highest goal.
* DONT KNOW ABOUT HEAVEN/PARADISE BUT FREEDOM FROM WHAT? WHO IS LOCKED UP HERE?
5. Others considered practicing celibacy as a virtue but Muhammad considered sensuality as a motivating factor and hence he didn’t preach celibacy at all.
* LETS ALL PRACTICE CELIBACY THEN, LOLZ POOR GUYS – NO SEX! DAMN THATS SAD! NO KIDS! THATS EVEN MORE SAD!
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW MANY “MEN” HERE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE UP CELIBACY?
6. Other prophets were peace lovers and preached forgiveness and peace and forbade wars/battles. Muhammad preached wars/battles and himself participated in them. In fact he went further and encouraged his entourage for plundering wealth and women of Non-Muslims as everthing belonged to Muslims, not to the kafirs!
* IF YOU HIT SOMEONE, YOU THINK HE/SHE WILL KEEP QUITE?
* READ ABOUT ALL THE BAD THINGS THAT WERE DONE TO HIM, AND HE KEPT CALM, MUSLIMS ARE LUCKY THEY AHD FEW WARS AND NOW THE FUTURE GENERATION IS ENJOYING “FREEDOM” THOSE WARS TO LET MUSLIMS LIVE IN PEACE! PLEASE GO STUDY ISLAM BEFORE YOU POST AN ARICLE.. YOU REALLY DIDNT DO YOUR HOMEWORK, AND FOR THAT MATTER LET ME TELL YOU.. HOW MY BUDDHIST FRIEND SAYS IT ALWAYS “EVEN LORD BUDDHA WILL NOT KEEP CALM IF YOU HIT HIM THE THIRD TIME”
7. Others considered women as respectables and didn’t allow the men to beat them. In fact respecting them was considered a virtue. Muhammad allowed them to be beated by the males.
* IT IS FORBIDDEN TO HIT ANYONE IN ISLAM.
8. Others didn’t prescribe any dress codes for the women while Muhammad prescribed.
* SIMPLE LOGIC – IF THERE ARE TWO CHOCOLATES ON A TABLE, ONE IS IN A WRAP OTHER ONE IS NOT. WHICH ONE WILL YOU CHOOSE??
BESIDES THERE IS A PROPOER REASONING BEHIND THE DRESS CODE AND FROM WHAT I KNOW MODESTY IS WHAT ALL MEN WANT? WHO WILL WANT HIS WIFE, DAUGHTER OR SISTER ROAMING AROUND HALF NAKED INFRONT OF OTHER MEN WHO ARE STARRING AT THEM LIKE WILD ANIMALS…
9. Others considered women equally qualified for the final goal of life depending on their behaviour. Also they considered the women as competent as the males. Muhammad, on the other hand considered the womenfolk as having half the intellect of males and a poor candidates for the Heaven/Paradise.
* WOMEN ARE EQUAL IN ISLAM HENCE MUSLIM WERE ORDERED TO TREAT THEM EQUALLY
10. Muhammad cried bitterly helplessly at the death of his son while others remain poised even in trying situations.
* I DONT KNOW FROM WHERE YOU GOT THIS? NOT TRUE!
Muhammad even after marrying 12 brides and passing all nights in their company, survived with a lone daughter who died just after his death at the age of 30 or so!
* WHEN YOU SAY “or so!” MEANS YOU DONT KNOW, OR YOU ARE NOT SURE THEN WHY DID YOU WASTE YOUR TIME WRITING STUFF YOU ARE NOT SURE ABOUT AND DONT KNOW ABOUT.
Based on the above facts, the Muslims should think without any malice against non-Muslims, what was so special or sublime in Muhammad to consider Him a prophet. Make your won research without any prejudice and draw conclusion.
* FIRST – YOUR SO CALLED FACTS ARE NOT “FACTS” YOU HAVE JUST TWISTED THINGS AND WRITTEN THEM IN A WAY IT LOOKS HORRIBLE. BUT THE WISE PEOPLE KNOW THAT THERE ARE TWO WAYS OF LOOKING AT THINGS A GLASS OF WATER CAN BE HALF EMPTY OR HALF FULL.
* SECOND – THANK YOU FOR WASTING MY TIME AND YOURS AND ALL THE PEOPLE WHO ARE READING THIS COMPLETE NONSENSE ARTICLE YOU HAVE MADE UP, BY YOUR INCOMPLETE SENSE ABOUT “ISLAM”
* TO ALL FELLOW MUSLIMS, SORRY I’M NOT VERY RELIGIOUS AND HENCE COULD NOT PUT HADITHS AS REPLIES, BUT I DID MY LEVEL BEST TO TELL THE OWNER OF THIS ARTICLE WHAT HE IS SAYING IS ALL CRAP AND LIE.
PEACE 🙂
Can the ADMIN delete this article, who has given you the right to do analysis about our Prophet (P.B.U.H) ??
ISLAM has nothing against women, its the bloody female dominating males that are ruining lives..
A new friend I met was expressing her concern about the mistreatment of women in the Islamic world. One issue that resonated strongly with her was that of male rapists going scot-free, while the raped women are often blamed for the rape and can even be punished under some Sharia courts.
Before getting to the Islamic roots of many of these illogical views on rape Islam has, we need to learn a bit about a rumour the Islamic prophet’s youngest child bride, Aisha, suffered from.
(This note isn’t intended to be a thorough analysis, but just some quick insights. This issue can take up volumes, I am sure.)
Details on a scandal involving Aisha is well-documented in Islamic texts of the Hadith and Sira (e.g. Sahih Muslim, Book 37, Number 6673; Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 48, Number 829).
The stories narrated are long, but to summarize, Aisha was accompanying a Muslim army, and she was one day erroneously left behind. A Muslim who lagged behind the army found her and she accompanied him back to the Muslim army.
Some Muslims spread accusations against her that she had had intercourse with the man. Aisha strongly denied this and was very hurt, but the rumours continued.
Eventually, Quranic revelations were revealed in which Aisha was declared innocent of the rumours being spread:
Quran 24: 13-16:
Why did they not bring four witnesses of it? But as they have not brought witnesses they are liars before Allah. And were it not for Allah’s grace upon you and His mercy in this world and the hereafter, a grievous chastisement would certainly have touched you on account of the discourse which you entered into. When you received it with your tongues and spoke with your mouths what you had no knowledge of, and you deemed it an easy matter while with Allah it was grievous. And why did you not, when you heard it, say: It does not beseem us that we should talk of it; glory be to Thee! this is a great calumny?
سورة النور
لَوْلَا جَاءُوا عَلَيْهِ بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَاءَ ۚ فَإِذْ لَمْ يَأْتُوا بِالشُّهَدَاءِ فَأُولَٰئِكَ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ هُمُ الْكَاذِبُونَ
وَلَوْلَا فَضْلُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَتُهُ فِي الدُّنْيَا وَالْآخِرَةِ لَمَسَّكُمْ فِي مَا أَفَضْتُمْ فِيهِ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ
إِذْ تَلَقَّوْنَهُ بِأَلْسِنَتِكُمْ وَتَقُولُونَ بِأَفْوَاهِكُمْ مَا لَيْسَ لَكُمْ بِهِ عِلْمٌ وَتَحْسَبُونَهُ هَيِّنًا وَهُوَ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ عَظِيمٌ
وَلَوْلَا إِذْ سَمِعْتُمُوهُ قُلْتُمْ مَا يَكُونُ لَنَا أَنْ نَتَكَلَّمَ بِهَٰذَا سُبْحَانَكَ هَٰذَا بُهْتَانٌ عَظِيمٌ
Quran 24:4 states that those who fail to bring four witnesses would be flogged:
And those who accuse free women then do not bring four witnesses, flog them, (giving) eighty stripes, and do not admit any evidence from them ever; and these it is that are the transgressors.
سورة النور
وَالَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ الْمُحْصَنَاتِ ثُمَّ لَمْ يَأْتُوا بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَاءَ فَاجْلِدُوهُمْ ثَمَانِينَ جَلْدَةً وَلَا تَقْبَلُوا لَهُمْ شَهَادَةً أَبَدًا ۚ وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ
From this, Islamic theologians stated that, in order to prove adultery or similar types of sexual misconduct, four male witnesses should be produced. The witness of a female is at most worth half that of a man’s, and limited to financial transactions (Quran 2:282).
As I understand it (and as I was raised to understand it), the rule of four witnesses was intended to protect Muslim women from being falsely labeled as having had forbidden intercourse (zina). That said, some Islamic clergy extended this rule to a bizarre situation: A woman claiming to have been raped will need to produce to the Sharia court four male witnesses to prove her case against the rapist. If she cannot produce four witnesses, her case turns into a chastity crime and is thus punished accordingly. Alternatively, she may be punished for making perceived false accusations. Also, at least one school of jurisprudence considers pregnancy sufficient evidence for sexual misconduct, so if a rape victim becomes pregnant and she cannot prove the rape, she can face lashing or death by stoning.
For example, Pakistan had been implementing the Hudood Ordinance for more than two decades, and it provided the requirements described above regarding rape victims. It was only relatively recently that a Women’s Protection Bill was passed that allows rape victims to charge their rapists under civil law. It was strongly opposed by religious Pakistani party members.
In Iran, Nazanin Mahabad Fatehi faced the death penalty for defending herself and her niece from being raped. As she defended herself with a knife, she stabbed one of the attempted rapists to his death. Without four male witnesses, she faced the death sentence. (She was released due to intense international and media attention.)
I also found a decent article on these issues on BBC: Debate rages over women and Sharia.
There’s also an impression, among a large number of Muslim followers, that if a woman is raped, it’s usually her fault; that her mere presence in the street without a veil, for example, has ‘tempted’ the poor man to rape her. A notorious example of this mentality among Western Muslims is a 7th century misogynistic Australian barbarian called Taj El-Din Al-Hilali, who said in a Friday sermon that if a woman gets raped, it is mostly the woman’s fault because she wasn’t in her home. He also said:
“If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it … whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem.”
Bigots come and go, but what’s disturbing in his case is that he is a leading Muslim figure in Australia, and that the Friday after his remarks were publicized, 5000 Muslims in Australia actually cheered in support of his remarks. Other Muslim leaders supported him, too (example).
I will need to make it clear and obvious that raping Muslim women is absolutely forbidden in Islam. However, there are some Muslims who go on raping rampages on non-Muslim women in Western countries, and they find justification for it, partly because “it’s the woman’s fault for going out without the veil”, and partly because of verses like Quran 4:24 and Quran 23:6, which permit a Muslim male to take non-Muslim women after a battle and keep them as war booty and as slaves (see my detailed note on this here). Those rapists tend not to look at the West favorably and consider themselves at war with it already, so they find their women legitimate for them. I have not heard of any scholar explicitly allow this though. There’s a very disturbing account of immigrant rape trends here.
To know about prophet of islam vist
http://www.muhammad.net
and yasmeen’s ID is fake creatd by bustard lyk satyen
hey bustard sayten n bitch yasmeen don’t speak agnst Muhammad s.a.w
Hi Satyenji,
Wonderful logical analysis made by you, but I have observation about its heading. How can a loose and bad character, criminal and enemy of humanity could be prophet?
Prophet is a kind hearted, perfect characteristic noral values but he raped little kids till his death.
Yasmeen https://www.interfaithshaadi.org/?p=5226